Saved report

Saved analysis

A persisted maintainer triage report for this pull request.

History
PR #1
reno-vic/Rattish
Feature/vonage messaging migration
reno-vic
Findings
13
Score
0
Saved Oct 13, 2026, 7:46 PM
ScoreHigh Risk
Analysis failed.
BitSpam score0/100
x
Maintainer
Contributor
Score breakdown
Points lost by category.
Intent
-35
Scope
-28
Tests
-3
Risk
-10
Contributor
-4
Spam
-18
Ci
-4
Maintainer Burden
-10
Findings
13 saved finding(s).
mediumPR description needs more context-12

The PR body is short, so maintainers may need to infer the problem, approach, and validation.

Add a short problem statement, solution summary, and validation notes.

lowDescription lacks review sections-5

The PR body does not appear to include common review sections such as summary, motivation, or testing.

Add short Summary and Testing sections so maintainers can scan the PR quickly.

lowMotivation is unclear-8

The PR text does not clearly explain why the change is needed.

Explain the user-visible problem or maintenance reason for the change.

mediumNo linked issue or explicit problem reference-10

The PR does not link to an issue or use a clear fixes/closes reference.

Link the relevant issue or explain the standalone problem this PR solves.

highLarge diff needs scope explanation-18

The diff is large enough that maintainers need a clear review strategy.

Explain the review plan or split unrelated work into smaller PRs.

mediumLockfile changed without explanation-10

A dependency lockfile changed, but the PR description does not explain why.

Explain the dependency change and why it is required.

infoTest files changed without validation notes-3

Test-like files changed, but the PR body does not say what was run.

Mention the test command or CI run used to validate the change.

mediumRisk-sensitive files changed-10

The PR touches files that often require deeper maintainer review.

Review these changes carefully and ask the contributor to explain the risk model.

lowCI is still pending-4

Some visible checks have not completed yet.

Wait for checks to complete before final review.

infoFirst-time contributor needs clear evidence-4

This appears to be a first-time or no-prior-merged contributor for this repository.

Do not penalize the contributor, but ask for clear intent and test evidence before deep review.

mediumNon-docs change has almost no explanation-12

The PR changes code or configuration but gives almost no explanation.

Ask the contributor to explain intent, scope, and validation.

lowMany low-signal whitespace-only diff lines-6

The diff contains many blank added or removed lines without enough explanation.

Ask the contributor to explain the meaningful behavior or documentation change.

mediumMaintainer review burden needs proof of work-10

This PR may require extra maintainer attention before it is ready for deep review.

Ask for a concise scope explanation, validation command, and review focus.